Under the Trump administration there has been a concerted effort to make disciplinary actions easier for agencies. Now OPM has been given authority to order the head of an agency to take action against agency employees for misconduct that occurs after being hired. Attorney Renn Fowler will explain how the changes can force the removal of an employee over the objection of the employing agency and impact agencies’ ability to take disciplinary action on their own.
Don’t miss the opportunity to learn directly from the coauthor of the highly regarded MSPB Charges and Penalties, A Charging Manual. Along with explanation of how we got from the previous OPM pre-appointment suitability determination process to the new rules, you’ll get guidance on:
Q&A time will follow the presentation, so you can ask Mr. Fowler your specific questions.
Renn C. Fowler is Of Counsel with Gilbert Employment Law, where he specializes in federal government employment law, MSPB, and EEOC. He represents agencies and employees, and provides lectures regarding employment law.
Mr. Fowler writes extensively on employment law and has coauthored the highly regarded MSPB Charges and Penalties, A Charging Manual, now in its 16th edition. He has served as a director for the Federal Training Foundation, the Government Training Foundation, and the Academy of Personnel Law and Public Administration.
Mr. Fowler was formerly with the General Counsel’s Office of GSA, serving in various positions, including Regional Counsel in San Francisco and Washington, D.C.. He is a member of the District of Columbia and Maryland Bars.
The return to in-person work has placed more federal employees in close proximity, creating increased opportunity for friction and claims of harassment. Add the Trump administration's evolving interpretation of EEO law, which appears to encourage more emphasis for some protected bases and less for others, and federal practitioners are left with many questions. Attend this webinar to learn how to best discourage and effectively respond to discriminatory harassment while applying current administration priorities.
Experienced EEO attorney Debra D’Agostino will describe unlawful harassment under different protected bases and the differences between in-person and virtual harassment, with specific examples of both. You’ll also learn how the terms “severe” and “pervasive” relate to stating a claim of discriminatory harassment and how the agency’s liability standard changes depending on whether the harasser is a supervisor or not.
Plus, you’ll leave with best practices to:
Ms. D’Agostino will end the webinar with Q&A, so you can get her insights on your specific concerns.
Debra D’Agostino, a Founding Partner of the Federal Practice Group and leader of the firm’s federal employment law team, focuses on providing representation to federal employees worldwide in a wide range of matters against federal agencies, including EEO complaints and U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) hearings, U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) appeals, U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC) complaints, and replying to proposed adverse actions or disciplinary actions. She has more than 20 years of experience in this complicated area of the law and has obtained successful outcomes for her clients, including findings of liability in discrimination claims and reversals of adverse actions such as removals. Additionally, Ms. D’Agostino has represented clients in appellate matters before the EEOC’s Office of Federal Operations, the MSPB, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal, Fourth, and D.C. Circuits.
Ms. D’Agostino is a popular presenter of LRP Federal Webinars and is a frequent speaker at LRP’s annual FDR TrainingSM attended by federal government employees from agencies nationwide.
The Trump administration has stated its intention to maximize religious expression and accommodation for religious practices that conflict with work requirements – a significant change that federal practitioners must understand and be prepared to address.
Experienced EEO attorney Deryn Sumner will detail all you need to know about this evolving landscape, starting with an overview of Title VII’s protections against religious discrimination, including disparate treatment, harassment, and the need to provide religious accommodation. You’ll also find out how undue hardship applies to religious accommodation, supported by recent EEOC case examples.
Along with learning how to factor recent OPM memos on religious accommodation and expression into agency EEO efforts, you’ll gain best practices to:
And with time for Q&A, you can get this expert’s answers to your specific questions.
Deryn Sumner, Esq., is a Partner at Gilbert Employment Law, as well as Co-Chair of the firm's Federal Sector EEOC Practice Group. She focuses her practice on representing federal employees and agencies before the EEOC and has worked on hundreds of cases involving claims of employment discrimination on the basis of disability, race, age, religion, retaliation, and other bases. She also has experience representing employees and agencies in cases of whistleblower retaliation and adverse action challenges before the MSPB. Ms. Sumner is the co-author of several books on federal sector employment law.
Ms. D’Agostino is a popular presenter of LRP Federal Webinars and is a frequent speaker at LRP’s annual FDR TrainingSM attended by federal government employees from agencies nationwide.